Work, Ed said, is social

Posted on December 8th, 2009 by Carl Joseph
Tags: , , , ,

The best boss I ever had—Ed Hahn, who directed Organization Development at Mattel—made it clear: You’re only work colleagues until you get to know each other. After that, you’re friends, acquaintances, or enemies. Work, Ed said, is social.

via Facebook at work isn’t an either/or proposition

Email overload

Email overload

In this post, Shel Holtz talks about how Facebook is becoming a more responsive form of communication than email. Too often, important messages get lost in your email (sometimes on purpose). I have emails in my inbox which have been there for months just waiting for me to action them one day. I’ve even taken the little red flag off some because I know I’m not ever going to get to them.

Email has been around now for decades. It’s a staple of our information diet and we’ve learnt how to deal with it. We have even developed specific behaviours around email, mainly because there is just so much of it to deal with.

Shel describes a distinct difference with social networks. The difference being that there is a strong desire to respond when a friend contacts you via Facebook, Twitter or other “social” tools.

  • Is this just because social networks are still a new phenomenon?
  • Is it because the “status update mountain” is still a molehill, unlike the “email mountain” becoming Everest?
  • Or is there perhaps something else at play here?

Transience

The nature of conversations in social networks is transient. There is a “now” feel to much of what is posted. This also gives it a non-persistent feel as well. In most of the networks I participate in, there isn’t a “keep unread” or “flag for later” notion. What you see when you look at the screen is what is going on right then and there. I find myself caring less about what happened whilst I wasn’t online. This is what people are calling the “real-time web.”

This “real-time” nature may be why I feel an urge to respond as soon as I read the tweet or status update. Because it’s happening right now, I feel a connection to the present moment and therefore the urge to engage. Email no longer has that effect on me. We’ve learnt that you can keep an email in your inbox for years with no repercussions. We haven’t figured that out yet with social media – there is a huge desire to not miss anything.

Relationships

In her article, Shel talks about the increasingly social nature of the workplace.

It’s another example of the intermingling of employees’ work lives and their lives away from work. People used to keep these dimensions of their lives separate, mostly because you interacted with your work colleagues at work and your friends and family at home. Those distinctions are rapidly evaporating when you add your work friends to your social networks; they all become part of a single relationship pool.

via Facebook at work isn’t an either/or proposition

It is now very easy to keep in touch with work colleagues and learn more about them, their interests and their everyday lives. This voyeuristic relationship building is different from the traditional face-to-face getting to know you many of us are used to. Whilst you can debate the effectiveness of it, in the workplace something very interesting is happening.

Different faces

Different faces

I would say that most people turn up to work with their “work face” on. When they leave, they put back on their “true face.” I’ve written a bit about this duality before and it’s a topic I’ve very passionate about. I believe it is truly changing the nature of work and the nature of our relationships.

Becoming “friends” with your colleagues bring this duality into line. Your work and non-work self suddenly come closer. People get to know the real you. You get to know the real people you work with. Your ability to work with one another is enhanced, significantly. Ultimately, you become free to become yourself and your organisation benefits because of it.

We respond quickly to work friends who ask for help via Facebook or Twitter because we have a closer relationship with them. They have become a part of our social circle. We know when they’re having trouble raising their children. We’ve seen the photos of their wedding. We may have read about their religious beliefs (which is not something usually discussable at work.) We feel connected to them and therefore our desire to engage increases.

As Ed Hahn says, “work is social.” I would add that “work is becoming more social.”

An aside: For any of my staff members reading this, it doesn’t mean I will accept your sick leave announcement via Facebook or Twitter. I’m not quite that progressive (yet)!



2 Responses to “Work, Ed said, is social”

  1. Joe Says:

    I’ve noticed that “real-time web” thing, just never heard it articulated before. And I’m exactly the same when it comes to e-mail vs. Twitter/Facebook. I used to “star” e-mails in Gmail, intending to reply to them at a later date, when I had more time or was in a better frame of mind to deal with it. But eventually the Gmail “star” began to lose all meaning as more and more e-mails went unanswered. Now I’ve gotten into the habit of marking e-mails as “unread” if I intend to reply to them later. It’s worked so far, as I like having my inbox clean, without any unread e-mails, although I can feel that method slowly going the way of the “star”. It’s getting to the point where e-mails must be marked “unread” AS WELL as “starred” for me to even take notice of them!

    I do respond more instantly to Twitter and Facebook friends (although my Facebook “inbox” doesn’t receive the same attention), but something about the idea of conducting business over Twitter and Facebook irks me. I wouldn’t really like a client sending me notes over Facebook or Twitter. E-mail still feels more “official” or something, probably because it’s more permanent than the “transient” social mediums. I guess it’s different when you’re building relationships with co-workers, though.

    I do worry about having my Twitter and Facebook linked up to my website, where prospective clients can get the skinny on me. I fear that something I tweeted or something in my Facebook profile, or even something I write on my blog, may unintentionally scare them off (I’ve made my Facebook profile private as a result). But at the same time, I am interested in being personable and “real” to my clients. I wonder if the number of potential clients I scare off is being counteracted by the number of clients who choose me because of my more “personable” web presence…

  2. Carl Joseph Says:

    Thanks for the comment. I hadn’t really thought about the situation you’re in. You’re basically presenting yourself as a brand. This makes it all the more challenging. In some ways, you want to work with people who “agree” with who you are as a person, but then you could also work with clients who aren’t. This is part of those “worlds colliding” thing which is starting to happen.

    I think in the future, the “brand you” is going to become very important. Important if you’re a freelancer but also important if you’re looking for work or working within another company/brand. http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/10/brandyou.html

    Here are some other posts that you might find interesting:

    http://profy.com/2009/11/30/online-life-extension-real-life/

    http://modite.com/blog/2009/12/08/the-corruption-of-authenticity/

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType